Listen to this text, read by Alan Davis-Drake.
Lacrim flood
Latin for 'tears'—Bradstreet signals this as a formal allegorical debate, not casual conversation. The setting itself is emotional, not neutral.
Flesh and Spirit
These aren't characters but personified abstractions—a debate form (called a 'dialogue of the soul') popular in medieval and early modern Protestant writing. Bradstreet uses it to stage an internal conflict.
Contemplation feed thee
Flesh attacks Spirit's immaterial sustenance as impossible. Notice the challenge: can thought alone sustain life? This is the poem's core question.
Contemplation feed thee
Flesh attacks Spirit's immaterial sustenance as impossible. Notice the challenge: can thought alone sustain life? This is the poem's core question.
Notion without Reality
Flesh demands empirical proof—things you can touch, see, hold. This is the language of materialism (in the philosophical sense), not just greed.
Notion without Reality
Flesh demands empirical proof—things you can touch, see, hold. This is the language of materialism (in the philosophical sense), not just greed.
Industry hath its recompence
Flesh speaks in the language of Protestant work ethic—labor produces visible reward. This would have resonated with Bradstreet's Puritan audience as seductive precisely because it sounds righteous.
unregenerate part
Calvinist theology: the 'unregenerate' are those without God's grace. Spirit doesn't argue with Flesh—it condemns her as fundamentally unsaved, shifting from debate to spiritual warfare.
old Adam / from above
Spirit claims different parentage: Flesh descends from Adam (human sin nature), while Spirit comes from God. This isn't sisterhood—it's cosmic opposition. The twins metaphor becomes ironic.
hidden manna
[CONTEXT] Exodus 16:4—God's supernatural food in the wilderness. Spirit doesn't eat bread but divine sustenance. Bradstreet transforms spiritual abstraction into physical metaphor to counter Flesh's materialism.
Mine eye doth pierce
Spirit claims superior vision—seeing what is 'invisible' to Flesh. After Flesh demanded sensory proof, Spirit inverts the hierarchy: spiritual sight is clearer than physical sight.
jasper stone / gates of pearl
[CONTEXT] Revelation 21:18-21—the New Jerusalem's materials. Bradstreet's final 20 lines are nearly direct quotation. She's not inventing heaven; she's claiming biblical authority for Spirit's promises.
no darksome night
Revelation 21:25. Notice the negations pile up: no sun, no moon, no candle, no sickness, no age, no unclean things. Heaven is defined by absence—the inverse of Flesh's abundance.
If I of heaven may have my fill
Spirit's final move: complete rejection of negotiation. Not 'I'll take some of each' but 'take the entire world—I want nothing from it.' This is absolute renunciation, not compromise.